4.1 Article

Evaluating Visual Analytics for Relevant Information Retrieval in Document Collections

Journal

INTERACTING WITH COMPUTERS
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 247-261

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/iwc/iwad019

Keywords

user experience; user study; visual analytics evaluation; text information retrieval; text visualization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Users have positive views on the potential of visual analytics systems in retrieval tasks, but they also face practical difficulties in using it effectively and show considerable variation in their assessment of specific functionalities. This highlights the potential of visual analytics systems and the importance of informing users about the underlying conceptual models and limitations.
Retrieving information from document collections is necessary in many contexts, e.g. researchers search for papers on a topic, physicians search for records of patients with a certain condition and police investigators seek relationships between different criminal reports. Finding relevant textual content in a corpus can be challenging in scenarios where the users expect a retrieval process with high recall. Visual Analytics (VA) systems that integrate interactive visualizations and machine learning algorithms are often advocated to support retrieval tasks in such complex scenarios. However, few studies report an end-user perspective on the utility of such systems. We present results from observational studies on VA-supported information retrieval conducted with graduate students and researchers using a system to explore collections of scientific papers. While users have, in general, positive views of the system's potential to facilitate their retrieval tasks, some faced practical difficulties in using it effectively, and we found considerable variation in their assessment of specific functionalities. Our findings reinforce the potential of VA systems and also the importance of carefully informing users of the underlying conceptual models in such systems and their limitations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available