4.3 Article

Quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization with dynamic grouping searching strategy

Journal

INTELLIGENT DATA ANALYSIS
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 769-789

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/IDA-226753

Keywords

Quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization; premature convergence; exploration; exploitation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a hybrid quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization algorithm (QPSO-DGS) with dynamic grouping searching strategy, which aims to solve the premature convergence issue in complex optimization problems. Experimental results show that QPSO-DGS has promising performance in terms of solution accuracy and convergence speed, especially on multimodal problems.
The quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization (QPSO) algorithm, a variant of particle swarm optimization (PSO), has been proven to be an effective tool to solve various of optimization problems. However, like other PSO variants, it often suffers a premature convergence, especially when solving complex optimization problems. Considering this issue, this paper proposes a hybrid QPSO with dynamic grouping searching strategy, named QPSO-DGS. During the search process, the particle swarm is dynamically grouped into two subpopulations, which are assigned to implement the exploration and exploitation search, respectively. In each subpopulation, a comprehensive learning strategy is used for each particle to adjust its personal best position with a certain probability. Besides, a modified opposition-based computation is employed to improve the swarm diversity. The experimental comparison is conducted between the QPSO-DGS and other seven state-of-art PSO variants on the CEC'2013 test suit. The experimental results show that QPSO-DGS has a promising performance in terms of the solution accuracy and the convergence speed on the majority of these test functions, and especially on multimodal problems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available