4.7 Article

Effective Enhancement of the Ferroelectric Performance of Polar Co-Gallate MOF by Doping M2+Ions (M = Mg, Mn, Ni) into Framework Nodes

Journal

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 62, Issue 18, Pages 7024-7031

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c00300

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A convenient strategy of doping metal ions into the framework nodes of MOFs is adopted to enhance ferroelectric performance. The doped Co-Gallate materials show obviously improved ferroelectric properties compared with the parent MOF, with enhanced remanent polarization. The increase in ferroelectric behavior is related to the difference in ionic radius between Co2+ ions and the metal ions.
MOF ferroelectrics have been demonstrated to be a promising candidate owing to various structures and controllable properties. However, weak ferroelectricity hampers their boom. Herein, a convenient strategy, doping metal ions into the framework nodes of parent MOF, is adopted to enhance ferroelectric performance. A series of M-doped Co-Gallate (M = Mg, Mn, Ni) were synthesized to improve ferroelectric properties. The electrical hysteresis loop demonstrated its ferroelectric behaviors, exhibiting obviously improved ferroelectric properties compared with the parent Co-Gallate. The remanent polarization was enhanced by two times for Mg-doped Co-Gallate, six times for Mn-doped Co-Gallate, and four times for Ni-doped Co-Gallate. The promoted ferroelectric performances are ascribed to the enhanced polarity of the overall structure triggered by framework distortion. Intriguingly, ferroelectric behaviors increase in the order Mg < Ni < Mn, displaying the same tendency as the difference value in the ionic radius between Co2+ ions and M2+metal ions (M = Mg, Mn, Ni). These results demonstrate doping of metal ions is a valid strategy to enhance ferroelectric performances, which may serve as a guide in modulating ferroelectric behaviors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available