4.7 Article

Noise-related face image recognition based on double dictionary transform learning

Journal

INFORMATION SCIENCES
Volume 630, Issue -, Pages 98-118

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2023.02.041

Keywords

Face recognition; Noisy image; Double dictionary learning; Label release

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel noise-related face image recognition method based on double dictionary transform learning (DDTL) is proposed in this paper. The method removes the redundant information and noise in the training images, making the learned dictionary more discriminative. It also introduces a linear regression term to enhance the differences between classes. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms existing methods.
The existing single dictionary learning algorithms are applied to face recognition and achieve satisfactory results. However, their performance is poor when dealing with noisy images and images involving complex variations such as large pose variations and occlusions. In this paper, a novel noise-related face image recognition method based on double dictionary transform learning (DDTL) is proposed. On the one hand, DDTL introduces the L2,p-norm to remove the redundant information in the dictionary and the noise involved in the training images, which makes the learned dictionary more discriminative. On the other hand, DDTL introduces the analysis dic-tionary and performs double dictionary transform learning with the synthetic dictionary. This can better reveal the relationship between the samples and the representation coefficients, and improve the accuracy of the learned dictionary and representation coefficients. Besides, DDTL introduces a linear regression term in the model learning process, which can distinguish and expand the differences between classes. Experimental results on six databases show that DDTL is superior to existing methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available