Semantic matching in machine reading comprehension: An empirical study

Machine reading comprehension (MRC) is a challenging task in the field of artificial intelligence. Most existing MRC works contain a semantic matching module, either explicitly or intrinsically, to determine whether a piece of context answers a question. However, there is scant work which systematically evaluates different paradigms using semantic matching in MRC. In this paper, we conduct a systematic empirical study on semantic matching. We formulate a two -stage framework which consists of a semantic matching model and a reading model, based on pre-trained language models. We compare and analyze the effectiveness and efficiency of using semantic matching modules with different setups on four types of MRC datasets. We verify that using semantic matching before a reading model improves both the effectiveness and efficiency of MRC. Compared with answering questions by extracting information from concise context, we observe that semantic matching yields more improvements for answering questions with noisy and adversarial context. Matching coarse-grained context to questions, e.g., paragraphs, is more effective than matching fine-grained context, e.g., sentences and spans. We also find that semantic matching is helpful for answering who/where/when/what/how/which questions, whereas it decreases the MRC performance on why questions. This may imply that semantic matching helps to answer a question whose necessary information can be retrieved from a single sentence. The above observations demonstrate the advantages and disadvantages of using semantic matching in different scenarios.

Automated summary

This paper conducts a systematic empirical study on semantic matching in machine reading comprehension (MRC). It formulates a two-stage framework and compares different setups of semantic matching modules on four MRC datasets. The study finds that semantic matching improves the effectiveness and efficiency of MRC, especially for answering questions with noisy and adversarial context. Matching coarse-grained context to questions and using semantic matching modules is more effective than fine-grained context matching, such as sentences and spans. However, semantic matching decreases the performance on why questions, suggesting that it is more helpful for questions that can be answered by retrieving information from a single sentence.