4.7 Article

Multitask learning for multilingual intent detection and slot filling in dialogue systems

Journal

INFORMATION FUSION
Volume 91, Issue -, Pages 299-315

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2022.09.029

Keywords

Multitask learning; Multilingual analysis; Information fusion; Intent detection; Slot filling; Deep learning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research proposes a multilingual multitask approach that improves intent accuracy and slot filling for three different languages. The experimental results show an improvement in both tasks for all languages.
Dialogue systems are becoming an ubiquitous presence in our everyday lives having a huge impact on business and society. Spoken language understanding (SLU) is the critical component of every goal-oriented dialogue system or any conversational system. The understanding of the user utterance is crucial for assisting the user in achieving their desired objectives. Future-generation systems need to be able to handle the multilinguality issue. Hence, the development of conversational agents becomes challenging as it needs to understand the different languages along with the semantic meaning of the given utterance. In this work, we propose a multilingual multitask approach to fuse the two primary SLU tasks, namely, intent detection and slot filling for three different languages. While intent detection deals with identifying user's goal or purpose, slot filling captures the appropriate user utterance information in the form of slots. As both of these tasks are highly correlated, we propose a multitask strategy to tackle these two tasks concurrently. We employ a transformer as a shared sentence encoder for the three languages, i.e., English, Hindi, and Bengali. Experimental results show that the proposed model achieves an improvement for all the languages for both the tasks of SLU. The multi-lingual multi-task (MLMT) framework shows an improvement of more than 2% in case of intent accuracy and 3% for slot F1 score in comparison to the single task models. Also, there is an increase of more than 1 point intent accuracy and 2 points slot F1 score in the MLMT model as opposed to the language specific frameworks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available