4.6 Article

Advanced Design of Ammonia Production Processes from LNG: Efficient and Economical Cold Energy Utilization Methods

Journal

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Volume 62, Issue 19, Pages 7554-7565

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.3c00058

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Efficient green energy technologies are crucial for sustainable green hydrogen applications, but economic reasons require bridging technologies between fossil fuels and green hydrogen. Natural gas, as the cleanest fossil fuel, can provide non-carbon containing energy resources like hydrogen and ammonia, making them suitable for economical energy storage and transportation as well as direct use as a fuel.
Efficient green energy technologies are essential for sustainable green hydrogen applications. However, economic reasons necessitate bridging technologies between fossil fuels and green hydrogen. Natural gas, the cleanest fossil fuel, can provide non-carbon containing energy resources, such as hydrogen and ammonia. Ammonia is suitable for economical hydrogen storage and transportation and for direct use as a fuel. In this study, efficient liquefied natural gas (LNG) cold energy utilization and recovery methods developed for producing ammonia are Design 1: energy production in an organic Rankine cycle and Design 2: energy reduction in an air separation unit (ASU). In Design 1, LNG cold energy is converted into power and supplied to the nitrogen compression stage for synthesizing ammonia. In Design 2, LNG cold energy is directly provided to the ASU to reduce the outlet temperature of nitrogen, which is sent to the compression stage, and the compression energy is consequently reduced. Through thermodynamic analysis, the process of LNG cold energy recovery is determined, and the energy consumption in each design is compared. Techno-economic analysis presents the cost reduction in the levelized cost of ammonia (LCOA). Compared with the base case, the energy consumption and LCOA in Design 2 are reduced by 11.54 and 23.02%, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available