4.6 Article

Co-Optimizing Insulative and Mechanical Properties of Quartz Fabric Reinforced Phenolic Composites by a Compromising Porous Structure for Thermal Insulation

Journal

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c04483

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A trade-off design of porous structure was developed for mid density nanoporous phenolic composites (NPC), which showed high-strength, insulation, and anti-ablation abilities. The thermal conductivity of NPC was effectively limited within 0.079-0.115 W/(m center dot K), with a mid-density of 0.89-1.04 g/cm3. Furthermore, NPC exhibited excellent insulation and ablation resistance under oxy-acetylene heat flux.
Introducing porosity into structures is recognized as a practical strategy to achieve lightweightness and insulation for ablatives, but reduced matrix density leads to the weakening of mechanical and anti-ablation performances. Herein, a trade-off design of the porous structure is developed for integrating high-strength, insulation, and anti-ablation abilities into mid density nanoporous phenolic composites (NPC). Benefiting from a narrow nanopore size (20-62 nm) of the matrix, thermal conductivity of NPC can be effectively limited within 0.079-0.115 W/(m center dot K), while showing a mid-density of 0.89-1.04 g/cm3. Meanwhile, NPC shows a considerable axial tensile strength of 130.2-177.8 MPa and out-of-plane compressive strength of 300 MPa due to the compromising porosity (34-62%) and reinforcing of the 3D needle-punched quartz fiber preform. Besides, NPC exhibits excellent oxidation resistance in static radiation heating (1000 degrees C) and outstanding insulation and ablation resistance under an oxy-acetylene heat flux of 1.76 and 4.18 MW/m2 with the linear ablation rates of 0.102 and 0.185 mm/s, respectively. The results will further promote the development and application of phenolic ablatives in extreme re-entry environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available