Journal
INDIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
SPRINGER INDIA
DOI: 10.1007/s12098-022-04436-1
Keywords
Nausea; Vomiting; PeNAT; Child; Pediatric; Chemotherapy
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The Pediatric Nausea Assessment Tool (PeNAT) was translated into Hindi and validated in Indian pediatric cancer patients and survivors. The PeNAT-Hindi showed good reliability and acceptable validity, making it suitable for measuring nausea among Hindi-speaking children. Further evaluation is needed to assess the responsiveness of PeNAT-Hindi to changes in nausea severity.
ObjectivesTo translate the Pediatric Nausea Assessment Tool (PeNAT) into Hindi and validate it in Indian pediatric cancer patients and survivors.MethodsThe PeNAT-Hindi was finalized by forward and backward translations, and pilot testing. The PeNAT-Hindi was administered to 200 Hindi-speaking pediatric (4-18 y) cancer patients/survivors, in three groups. These included pediatric cancer patients who had recently received chemotherapy (n = 150); who received no chemotherapy within 5 d (n = 25) and survivors (n = 25). Construct validity was tested by comparing scores among the three groups. Test-retest reliability and criterion validity were estimated by the correlation of the first PeNAT score with the second (taken 1 h later) PeNAT score and the number of vomiting/retching episodes, respectively. Convergent validity and discriminant validity were estimated by correlating PeNAT scores with parent-assessed nausea severity, and pain, respectively. The responsiveness was tested by comparing second PeNAT scores with subsequent divergent PeNAT scores among patients reporting subjective change (improvement and worsening, respectively) in nausea severity.ResultsTest-retest reliability of PeNAT-Hindi was good (intraclass correlation = 0.791). The initial PeNAT score had moderate correlation with the number of vomiting/retching episodes (Spearman rho = 0.401). Median PeNAT scores in group 1 versus groups 2 and 3 were significantly different (p < 0.001). Initial PeNAT scores showed a moderate correlation with parent-assessed nausea (Spearman rho = 0.657) and a weak correlation with parent-assessed pain (Spearman rho = 0.319). The responsiveness (standardized response mean) of PeNAT-Hindi to the change in nausea severity was -1.79 (improvement) and 2.19 (worsening), respectively.ConclusionPeNAT-Hindi showed good reliability and acceptable validity. It may be used among Hindi-speaking children for measuring nausea. The responsiveness of PeNAT-Hindi needs further evaluation.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available