4.8 Article

Age-dependent differences in efferocytosis determine the outcome of opsonophagocytic protection from invasive pathogens

Journal

IMMUNITY
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages 1255-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2023.03.018

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In early life, neonatal neutrophils show enhanced CD11b-dependent opsonophagocytosis, leading to improved protection against Streptococcus pneumoniae (Spn). The augmented function of neonatal neutrophils is mediated by higher CD11b surface expression and dampened efferocytosis, resulting in more CD11bhi aged neutrophils in peripheral blood. Experimentally impairing efferocytosis later in life increases CD11bhi neutrophils and improves protection against Spn.
In early life, susceptibility to invasive infection skews toward a small subset of microbes, whereas other path-ogens associated with diseases later in life, including Streptococcus pneumoniae (Spn), are uncommon among neonates. To delineate mechanisms behind age-dependent susceptibility, we compared age-specific mouse models of invasive Spn infection. We show enhanced CD11b-dependent opsonophagocytosis by neonatal neutrophils improved protection against Spn during early life. The augmented function of neonatal neutrophils was mediated by higher CD11b surface expression at the population level due to dampened ef-ferocytosis, which also resulted in more CD11bhi agedneutrophils in peripheral blood. Dampened effero-cytosis during early life could be attributed to the lack of CD169+ macrophages in neonates and reduced sys-temic expressions of multiple efferocytic mediators, including MerTK. On experimentally impairing efferocytosis later in life, CD11bhi neutrophils increased and protection against Spn improved. Our findings reveal how age-dependent differences in efferocytosis determine infection outcome through the modulation of CD11b-driven opsonophagocytosis and immunity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available