4.7 Article

Design, Control, and Experimental Evaluation of a Novel Robotic Glove System for Patients With Brachial Plexus Injuries

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages 1637-1652

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TRO.2022.3220973

Keywords

Exoskeleton glove; grasp assistance; series elastic actuator (SEA); wearable robotics

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents the development of an exoskeleton glove system for brachial plexus injury patients to regain grasping functionality. The study explores design principles, optimization strategies, and compares various force control methods. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed exoskeleton glove system has the potential to be used as a rehabilitation device.
This article presents the development of an exoskeleton glove system for people who suffer from brachial plexus injuries, aiming to assist their lost grasping functionality. The robotic system consists of a portable glove system and an embedded controller. The glove system consists of linear series elastic actuators, rotary series elastic actuators, and optimized finger linkages to provide imitated human motion to each finger and a coupled motion of the hand. The design principles and optimization strategies were investigated to balance functionality, portability, and stability. The model-based force control strategy compensated with a backlash model and model-free force control strategy are presented and compared. Results show that our proposed model-free control method achieves the goal of accurate force control. Finally, experiments were conducted with the prototype of the developed integrated exoskeleton glove system. Results from three subjects with 150 trials show that our proposed exoskeleton glove system has the potential to be used as a rehabilitation device for patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available