4.7 Article

Real-Time Robust Receding Horizon Planning Using Hamilton-Jacobi Reachability Analysis

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages 90-109

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TRO.2022.3187291

Keywords

Trajectory; Planning; Safety; Reachability analysis; Ellipsoids; Runtime; Libraries; Motion and path planning; optimization and optimal control; reachability analysis; robot safety

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents a real-time receding-horizon robust trajectory planning algorithm for nonlinear closed-loop systems, which guarantees the safety of the system under unknown but bounded disturbances. The proposed method enables real-time replanning of a reference trajectory with safety guarantees even when the system encounters unexpected disturbances in runtime.
Safety guarantee prior to the deployment of robots can be difficult due to unexpected disturbances in runtime. This article presents a real-time receding-horizon robust trajectory planning algorithm for nonlinear closed-loop systems, which guarantees the safety of the system under unknown but bounded disturbances. We characterize the forward reachable sets (FRSs) of the system based on the Hamilton-Jacobi reachability analysis as a means for safety verification. For the online computation of the FRSs, we approximate nonlinear systems as LTV systems with linearization errors and compute ellipsoids that encompass the FRSs in continuous time. Using the proposed ellipsoidal approximation of the FRSs, we formulate a computationally tractable robust planning problem that can be solved online. Consequently, the proposed method enables real-time replanning of a reference trajectory with safety guarantees even when the system encounters unexpected disturbances in runtime. The flight experiment of obstacle avoidance in a windy environment validates the proposed robust planning algorithm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available