4.8 Article

Combinatorial Learning of Robust Deep Graph Matching: An Embedding Based Approach

Journal

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2020.3005590

Keywords

Mathematical model; Feature extraction; Peer-to-peer computing; Training; Optimization; Tensors; Pattern matching; Graph matching; deep learning; graph embedding; combinatorial optimization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper utilizes deep neural networks to learn node and edge features, as well as an affinity model for graph matching. The approach is flexible, capable of handling varying numbers of nodes, and shows state-of-the-art performance on extensive benchmarks.
Graph matching aims to establish node correspondence between two graphs, which has been a fundamental problem for its NP-hard nature. One practical consideration is the effective modeling of the affinity function in the presence of noise, such that the mathematically optimal matching result is also physically meaningful. This paper resorts to deep neural networks to learn the node and edge feature, as well as the affinity model for graph matching in an end-to-end fashion. The learning is supervised by combinatorial permutation loss over nodes. Specifically, the parameters belong to convolutional neural networks for image feature extraction, graph neural networks for node embedding that convert the structural (beyond second-order) information into node-wise features that leads to a linear assignment problem, as well as the affinity kernel between two graphs. Our approach enjoys flexibility in that the permutation loss is agnostic to the number of nodes, and the embedding model is shared among nodes such that the network can deal with varying numbers of nodes for both training and inference. Moreover, our network is class-agnostic. Experimental results on extensive benchmarks show its state-of-the-art performance. It bears some generalization capability across categories and datasets, and is capable for robust matching against outliers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available