4.4 Article

A Kernel-Free Boundary Integral Method for 2-D Magnetostatics Analysis

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.2023.3247444

Keywords

Integral equations; Finite element analysis; Magnetostatics; Magnetic cores; Optimization; Geometry; Permeability; Boundary element method (BEM); boundary integral method; finite element method (FEM); magnetostatics analysis; toroidal core

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A kernel-free boundary integral method (KFBIM) is introduced for solving magnetic computations in a 2-D toroidal core geometry. It shows advantages over traditional finite difference methods, providing more accurate and efficient calculations of magnetic flux and tangential field intensity. The results obtained are in excellent agreement with a commercial finite element solver (ANSYS).
Performing magnetostatic analysis accurately and efficiently is very important for multi-objective optimization of electromagnetic device designs. In this research, a kernel-free boundary integral method (KFBIM) has been introduced for solving magnetic computations in a toroidal core geometry in 2-D. This study is very relevant in the design and optimization of toroidal inductors or transformers used in electrical systems, where lighter weight, higher inductance, higher efficiency, and lower leakage flux are required. The governing partial differential equations (PDEs) have been formulated as a system of the Fredholm integral equations of the second kind. Unlike traditional boundary integral methods or boundary element methods, KFBIM does not require an analytical form of Green's function for evaluating integrals via numerical quadrature. Instead, KFBIM computes integrals by solving an equivalent interface problem on a Cartesian mesh. Compared with traditional finite difference methods for solving the governing PDEs directly, KFBIM produces a well-conditioned linear system. Therefore, the KFBIM requires only a fixed number of iterations when an iterative method [e.g., generalized minimal residual method (GMRES)] is applied for solving the linear system, and the numerical solution is not sensitive to computer round-off errors. The obtained results are then compared with a commercial finite element solver (ANSYS), which shows excellent agreement. It should be noted that, compared with FEM, the KFBIM does not require a body-fit mesh and can achieve high accuracy with a coarse mesh. In particular, the calculations of the magnetic potential and the tangential field intensity on the boundaries are more stable and exhibit almost no oscillations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available