4.4 Article

Hysteresis Loops of Recording Media Grains Under the Influence of High-Frequency Fields

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS
Volume 59, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.2022.3220717

Keywords

Magnetic hysteresis; Media; Temperature; Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy; Magnetostatics; Coercive force; Magnetic heads; Hysteresis loop; microwave-assisted magnetic recording (MAMR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hysteresis loops of single grains and recording media were calculated under the influence of high-frequency (HF) magnetic fields, similar to those produced by a spin-torque oscillator (STO) in microwave-assisted magnetic recording (MAMR). The effect of the HF field ellipticity and the strength of magnetostatic interactions between grains were investigated. Elliptical HF fields with a major:minor axis ratio of 6:1 were almost as effective as circular HF fields in reducing the media coercivity. For media with a small grain pitch, i.e., strong magnetostatic interactions between grains, the HF field was able to reduce the coercivity by much more than when the grains were far apart, and magnetostatic interactions were weak.
Hysteresis loops of single grains and recording media were calculated under the influence of high-frequency (HF) magnetic fields, similar to those produced by a spin-torque oscillator (STO) in microwave-assisted magnetic recording (MAMR). The effect of the HF field ellipticity and the strength of magnetostatic interactions between grains were investigated. Elliptical HF fields with a major:minor axis ratio of 6:1 were almost as effective as circular HF fields in reducing the media coercivity. For media with a small grain pitch, i.e., strong magnetostatic interactions between grains, the HF field was able to reduce the coercivity by much more than when the grains were far apart, and magnetostatic interactions were weak.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available