4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Multi-Area Frequency Restoration Reserve Sizing

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS
Volume 59, Issue 3, Pages 2856-2865

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIA.2023.3242638

Keywords

Balancing area; frequency restoration reserves; multi-area reserve commitment; probabilistic reserves; renewable generation; reserve sizing; reserve commitment; reserve sharing; transmission systems; TSO

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article proposes a probabilistic method for shared cross-border frequency restoration reserve commitment and sizing based on system generation margin and mathematical optimization. By considering cross-border interconnection capacities and uncertainties, it can significantly reduce overall reserve volumes and costs while ensuring security.
Frequency Restoration Reserves are traditionally sized using deterministic methods. The constant growth in non-dispatchable renewable energy, however, is increasing the importance of probabilistic methods for reserve sizing. In addition, as the geographical scope of reserve sizing expands, overall power imbalance stochasticity is reduced. In this article, we propose a probabilisticmethod for shared cross-border frequency restoration reserve commitment and sizing, based on the concept of system generation margin and employing mathematical optimization. The aim is to reduce overall reserve volumes and costs. The cross-border interconnection capacities among countries are taken into account, and the shared uncertainty across interconnections is addressed via a novel robust approach. The method is tested on the cross-border system of south-east Europe that includes 9 countries. 5 different operational scenarios are used and a detailed calculation of the uncertainty distributions in each country is employed. Results show that cross-border shared sizing can significantly reduce overall reserve volumes and costs in a secure way.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available