4.7 Article

Distributed Interval Consensus of Multiagent Systems With a Pulse Width Modulation Protocol

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL
Volume 68, Issue 3, Pages 1730-1737

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2022.3152727

Keywords

Protocols; Pulse width modulation; Multi-agent systems; Topology; Switches; Time-varying systems; Stability criteria; Distributed protocol; interval consensus; multiagent systems; pulsewidth modulation (PWM)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article proposes a pulsewidth modulation (PWM) protocol to improve the interval consensus of multiagent systems from a distributed perspective. The consensus is achieved within a prescribed interval, which is only available to partial agents. The PWM protocol effectively reduces the running burden of the agents without the need for additional analogue-to-digital conversion.
Rather than the conventional pure consensus, this article proposes a pulsewidth modulation (PWM) protocol for an improved interval consensus of multiagent systems from the distributed perspective. In particular, the consensus of all the agents is achieved within a prescribed interval, which is merely available to partial agents, though. The PWM protocol effectively relieves the running burden of the agents without the additional analogue-to-digital conversion. The modulation periods of different agents are allowed to be heterogeneous. By nominating the agents that have access to the given interval as leaders and others as followers, the proposed distributed PWM protocol introduces a projection operator for the leaders in order for the collective aggregation. In terms of the graph connectivity condition of containing a spanning tree, it is shown that the concerned interval consensus objective is realized by the proposed distributed PWM protocol. Simulations are eventually performed to validate the established theoretical results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available