4.4 Article

Test Results of a Prototype HTS Current Lead With MgB2 and NbTi Superconducting Joints

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2023.3258979

Keywords

BSCCO-2223; current leads (CL); high-temperature superconductor (HTS); joints; MgB2; NbTi; SST-1

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A conduction-cooled, high-temperature superconductor current lead has been developed, allowing operation up to 80K and saving cryogenic capacity in superconducting magnets. The lead utilizes commercially available rare earth cuprate oxide superconductor tapes and magnesium diboride for joints. Experimental results show promising performance of the lead.
Conventional vapor cooled current leads (CL) based on low-temperature superconductor are the major consumer of liquid helium in large-scale superconducting magnets-based nuclear fusion devices. Use of conduction-cooled, high-temperature superconductors (HTS) CL enable operation up to 80 K and saves significant cold capacity of cryo plant. Recently at Institute for Plasma Research, India, a 3.3 kA rated prototype HTS CL pair is developed with the help of Indian industries. It exploits various superconducting materials operating from 5 to 80 K. HTS module is based on commercially available rare earth cuprate oxide superconductor based BSCCO-2223 tapes. For testing purpose, we have developed bottom lap joints using composite magnesium diboride (MgB2) wires as an intermediate between HTS module and NbTi: Cu cable that act as a shunt between CL pair. Such a hybrid concept is adopted as the next step to developing MgB2 superconducting current feeder which could be operated near 20 K and save cryogenic cost in future fusion machines. Here, we report the salient features, basic details of HTS CL, superconducting joints fabrication, its test set-up, and experimental results. The inference from test results is then reported and discussed in detail.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available