4.7 Article

Unbiased Conversion of 3-D Bistatic Radar Measurements to Cartesian Position

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAES.2022.3203958

Keywords

Coordinate measuring machines; Bistatic radar; Radar tracking; Transmitters; Radar measurements; Target tracking; Receiving antennas; 3-D bistatic radar; bistatic tracking; converted measurement; coordinate transformation; Kalman filter; radar measurements; radar tracking; target tracking

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tracking with bistatic radar measurements is challenging due to the nonlinear relationship between measurements and Cartesian coordinates. This paper proposes a solution by converting the bistatic 3-D sine-space position measurements to Cartesian coordinates using a second-order Taylor expansion, which provides an unbiased and statistically consistent conversion.
Tracking with bistatic radar measurements is a challenging problem due to the nonlinear relationship between the radar measurements and the Cartesian coordinates, especially for long distances. This nonlinearity leads, for three-dimensional (3-D) bistatic radar, to a nonellipsoidal measurement uncertainty region in Cartesian coordinates, similar to a thin contact lens, that causes consistency problems for a tracking filter. A solution is proposed by developing an unbiased and statistically consistent conversion of the bistatic 3-D sine-space position measurements to Cartesian coordinates, based on second-order Taylor expansion. Such an approach was successfully used for monostatic radars but considered impractical for the bistatic case due to the difficulty to derive explicit conversion expressions, as done in this article. The recently developed 2-D approach for the bistatic case could not be successfully extended to 3-D and a different conversion was needed. It is shown that in contrast to the first-order conversion and the best nonlinear conversions (based on the cubature method), only the proposed conversion can cover the true uncertainty.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available