4.6 Article

Predictive Agent-Based Crowd Model Design Using Decentralized Control Systems

Journal

IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages 1383-1394

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSYST.2022.3188339

Keywords

Behavioral sciences; Computational modeling; Buildings; Predictive models; Complex systems; Sensors; Safety; Agent-based modeling; complex systems; decentralized control; emergence; human behavior modeling; intelligent agents; simulation model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article proposes a predictive agent-based crowd simulation model to analyze the outcomes of emergency evacuation scenarios, taking into account collisions between pedestrians, smoke, fire sprinklers, and exit indicators. The crowd model is based on a decentralized control system structure, where each pedestrian agent is governed through a deliberative-reactive control architecture. Results show that the crowd simulation model based on agent autonomy and local interactions is able to generate higher level crowd dynamics through emergence.
As a complex system, crowd dynamics emerge bottom-up from the local interactions between pedestrians as component subsystems. This article proposes a predictive agent-based crowd simulation model to analyze the outcomes of emergency evacuation scenarios taking into account collisions between pedestrians, smoke, fire sprinklers, and exit indicators. The crowd model is based on a decentralized control system structure, where each pedestrian agent is governed through a deliberative-reactive control architecture. The simulation model for evacuation includes a routing-based control system for dynamic-guided evacuation. A design case illustrates the modeling process. Results show that the crowd simulation model based on agent autonomy and local interactions is able to generate higher level crowd dynamics through emergence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available