4.6 Article

Integration of Physics- and Data-Driven Power System Models in Transient Analysis After Major Disturbances

Journal

IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages 479-490

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSYST.2022.3150237

Keywords

Mathematical models; Data models; Power system dynamics; Computational modeling; Predictive models; Extraterrestrial measurements; Transient analysis; Compressed sensing; deep learning; dynamic model; Koopman modes; neural network; nonlinear dynamics; power system; system identification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article explores the analysis of transient phenomena in large-scale power systems subjected to major disturbances from the aspect of interleaving, coordinating, and refining physics- and data-driven models. The study proposes a framework that enables coordinated and seamlessly integrated use of the two types of models in engineered systems.
The article explores the analysis of transient phenomena in large-scale power systems subjected to major disturbances from the aspect of interleaving, coordinating, and refining physics- and data-driven models. Major disturbances can lead to cascading failures and ultimately to the partial power system blackout. Our primary interest is in a framework that would enable coordinated and seamlessly integrated use of the two types of models in engineered systems. Parts of this framework include: 1) optimized compressed sensing, 2) customized finite-dimensional approximations of the Koopman operator, and 3) gray-box integration of physics-driven (equation-based) and data-driven (deep neural network-based) models. The proposed three-stage procedure is applied to the transient stability analysis on the multimachine benchmark example of a 441-bus real-world test system, where the results are shown for a synchronous generator with local measurements in the connection point.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available