4.6 Article

Joint Energy and Workload Scheduling for Fog-Assisted Multimicrogrid Systems: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach

Journal

IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages 164-175

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSYST.2022.3171534

Keywords

Microgrids; Task analysis; Costs; Energy management; Renewable energy sources; Reinforcement learning; Optimization; Deep reinforcement learning; energy management; fog-assisted; Markov game; multimicrogrid; operating cost

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article investigates the fog-assisted operating cost minimization problem of multi-microgrid system (MMGS) and proposes an energy management algorithm based on multiagent deep reinforcement learning to solve the Markov game. Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.
Due to the fluctuation of renewable energy, the uncertainty of electrical loads, and the complexity of networked microgrids, it is challenging to dispatch multiple resources to minimize the operating cost of multi-microgrid system (MMGS). In this article, a fog-assisted operating cost minimization problem of MMGS is investigated with the consideration of source-grid-load-storage-computing coordination. Since there are strong couplings among multiple resources, it is difficult to solve the problem directly. Therefore, the above problem is reformulated as a Markov game. Then, a novel energy management algorithm is proposed to solve Markov game based on multiagent deep reinforcement learning. It is worth mentioning that the proposed energy management algorithm can support local real-time decisions for each microgrid without knowing any prior knowledge of uncertain parameters and private information of other microgrids. Simulation results indicate that the proposed algorithm can reduce the long-term cost of each microgrid by 0.09%-8.02% compared with baselines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available