4.7 Article

Nonenzymatic Glucose Sensors of ZnO Nanorods Modified by Au Nanoparticles

Journal

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages 12503-12510

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2023.3272778

Keywords

Au/ZnO nanorods (NR) electrode; hydrothermal; nonenzymatic glucose sensor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a nonenzymatic glucose sensor based on Au nanoparticles adsorbed on ZnO nanorods was successfully synthesized. The resulting Au/ZnO nanorods exhibited excellent sensitivity and selectivity for glucose detection, with a linear range of 0-8 mM. The sensor also showed good selectivity in the presence of interfering species such as ascorbic acid and uric acid. This nonenzymatic glucose sensor is suitable for glucose detection in human blood samples.
In this article, the nonenzymatic glucose sensor Au nanoparticles (NPs) adsorbed on ZnO nanorods (NRs) was synthesized onto glass substrate by the hydrothermal method, and Au NPs were deposited on the surface of ZnO NRs via direct-current (dc) sputter system. The morphologies and crystal structures of ZnO and Au/ZnO NRs were investigated by field-emission scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and X-ray diffraction. The Au NPs adsorbed on the ZnO NR (Au/ZnO) electrode exhibited excellent sensitivity and selectivity for glucose detection. Under an applied bias of 0.2 V, the sensitivity of ZnO and Au/ZnO NRs electrodes were 63.4 and 182.96 mu A/cm(2)center dot mM for linear range at 0-8 mM. In the interference detective section, the electrodes of ZnO and Au/ZnO NRs exhibited excellent selectivity for glucose detection when the test solutions contain various interfering species, such as ascorbic acid and uric acid. It is demonstrated that the nonenzymatic glucose sensor of the Au/ZnO NR electrode is suitable for glucose detection in human blood samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available