4.1 Article

Lasers on the Moon: Recommendations for Pioneering Lunar Communication Infrastructure

Journal

IEEE PERVASIVE COMPUTING
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages 19-25

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/MPRV.2023.3275772

Keywords

Moon; Radio frequency; Optical transmitters; Optical receivers; Optical sensors; Space vehicles; Security

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Future manned missions to the moon require fast and resilient communication infrastructure. This article compares radiofrequency and optical links in recent and ongoing missions, and proposes recommendations for lunar communications infrastructure. The approach focuses on scalable design, resilience to threats, and universal applicability. It discusses engineering efforts to mitigate weaknesses and achieve desired capabilities, and highlights upcoming missions as milestones for optical links.
Future missions carrying humans to the moon will require fast and resilient communication infrastructure to allow occupants to communicate between various orbiters, rovers, and stations-and to relay valuable data back to Earth. This work begins by examining the two core enabling technologies for space communications: radiofrequency and optical links. These approaches are compared in the context of recent and ongoing missions by NASA and private entities. We then propose a set of recommendations for lunar communications infrastructure to enable habitation. Three pillars unify the approach: scalable design and capabilities, resilience to environmental and cyber threats, and universal applicability to a wide range of mission profiles. The engineering efforts and areas of focus necessary to mitigate identified weaknesses and achieve the described capabilities are discussed. We conclude by highlighting the significance of several upcoming missions that will serve as milestones in proving the viability of optical links as dependable communications infrastructure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available