4.5 Article

Modelling daily streamflow in a temporary karst river system: comparing three approaches using the SWAT model

Journal

HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL
Volume 68, Issue 3, Pages 462-473

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2023.2174027

Keywords

SWAT model; karst areas; Mediterranean basin; hydrological regime; crack flow function

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study tests different options for simulating hydrology in basins with karst areas using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model. Different basin delineations and model parameterizations were adopted, including cutoff of karst areas, basin setup including karst areas, and model parameterization considering bypass flow in karst sub-basins. The performance of the model was satisfactory for daily streamflow and better for simulating large floods. Bypass flow proved to be a valid option to improve the simulation of hydrological processes in karst areas.
This work tests different options for simulating hydrology in basins with karst areas. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model was applied to the Canale d'Aiedda (Puglia, Italy), a Mediterranean temporary karst river basin. Different basin delineations and model parameterizations were adopted that include: (i) cutoff of the karst areas (configuration A); (ii) basin set-up including the karst areas (configuration B) and (iii) model parameterization considering a bypass flow in karst sub-basins (configuration C). The model performance was satisfactory for daily streamflow for configurations B and C and good for A. A better simulated large floods. C presented the best fit for monthly streamflow from May to July. Regarding the water balance, C showed higher values of surface runoff and lower values of total water yield than A and B. Bypass flow proved to be a valid option to improve the simulation of the hydrological processes in karst areas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available