☆ 4.7 Letter

DuoStim reduces time to pregnancy, minimizes treatment discontinuation, and is potentially cost-effective

HUMAN REPRODUCTION (2023)

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Review Obstetrics & Gynecology

Routine double-ovarian-stimulation (DuoStim) in poor responders lacks rationale, evidence, and follow-up

Angelo Tocci et al.

Summary: Double ovarian stimulation (DuoStim) is progressively used as a routine clinical IVF treatment, but there is a lack of rationale, evidence, and follow-up for this expansion. The authors suggest that DuoStim should only be used in controlled clinical trials with valid clinical indications and appropriate experimental consents.

HUMAN REPRODUCTION (2023)

Add to Collection
Review Obstetrics & Gynecology

Fertility treatment and cancers-the eternal conundrum: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Jennifer Frances Barcroft et al.

Summary: Overall, fertility treatment does not significantly increase the risk of breast, ovarian, or endometrial cancer, and may even lower the incidence of cervical cancer. However, there may be an association between certain fertility treatments like IVF and clomiphene citrate and increased risk of ovarian cancer, warranting further investigation.

HUMAN REPRODUCTION (2021)

Add to Collection
Review Genetics & Heredity

What is the true place of a double stimulation and double oocyte retrieval in the same cycle for patients diagnosed with poor ovarian reserve? A systematic review including a meta-analytical approach

Konstantinos Sfakianoudis et al.

JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS (2020)

Add to Collection
Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

The euploid blastocysts obtained after luteal phase stimulation show the same clinical, obstetric and perinatal outcomes as follicular phase stimulation-derived ones: a multicenter study

Alberto Vaiarelli et al.

HUMAN REPRODUCTION (2020)

Add to Collection
Review Genetics & Heredity

How effective are the non-conventional ovarian stimulation protocols in ART? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Demian Glujovsky et al.

JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS (2020)

Add to Collection
Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Comparison of live-birth defects after luteal-phase ovarian stimulation vs. conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization and vitrified embryo transfer cycles

Hong Chen et al.

FERTILITY AND STERILITY (2015)

Add to Collection
Webinars Posters Questions Hubs Funding Journals Papers Connect Collections Reviewers About Us FAQs Mobile App Privacy Policy Terms of Use
© Peeref 2019-2024. All rights reserved.