Historiographical approaches to biogeography: a critical review

We performed a critical review of the historiographical studies on biogeography. We began with the pioneering works of Augustin and Alphonse de Candolle. Then, we analyzed the historical accounts of biogeography developed by (1) Martin Fichman and his history on the extensionism-permanentism debate; (2) Gareth Nelson and his critique of the Neo-Darwinian historiography of biogeography; (3) Ernst Mayr, with his dispersalist viewpoint; (4) Alan Richardson, who wrote a microhistory on the biogeographic model constructed by Darwin; (5) Michael Paul Kinch and the ideas discussed in the 19th century about the geographical distribution of living beings; (6) Janet Browne, who highlighted the importance of the pre-Darwinian naturalists; (7) Peter Bowler, who focused mainly on the influence of paleontology on biogeography; (8) James Larson, who looked into the practices of the naturalists of Northern Europe in the late 18th century; and (9) Malte Ebach, who like Larson, was more interested in analysing the practices rather than the ideas of naturalists who studied the geographical distribution of organisms. Finally, these works are compared with each other. There has not been a dominant paradigm in the construction of historical narratives of biogeography; however, they provide a useful context for understanding problems of biogeography that continue to be debated to this day.

Automated summary

We conducted a critical review of historiographical studies on biogeography, analyzing the contributions of various scholars, such as Augustin and Alphonse de Candolle, Martin Fichman, Gareth Nelson, Ernst Mayr, Alan Richardson, Michael Paul Kinch, Janet Browne, Peter Bowler, James Larson, and Malte Ebach. Comparisons were made between these works, highlighting the absence of a dominant paradigm in constructing historical narratives of biogeography. Nevertheless, they provide valuable context for ongoing debates in the field.