4.6 Article

Transjugular intrahepatic collateral-systemic shunt is effective for cavernous transformation of the portal vein with variceal bleeding

Journal

HEPATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages 979-988

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12072-023-10522-z

Keywords

Occlusive portal vein thrombosis; Cavernous transformation; Refractory variceal bleeding; Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcollateral TIPS in the treatment of refractory variceal bleeding with cavernous transformation of the portal vein (CTPV). The results showed that transcollateral TIPS was as effective as portal vein recanalization-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (PVR-TIPS) in terms of rebleeding rate, overall survival, shunt dysfunction, and operation-related complications. However, the rate of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) was significantly lower in the transcollateral TIPS group.
BackgroundThe transjugular intrahepatic portal collateral-systemic shunt (transcollateral TIPS) is used to treat portal hypertension-related complications in patients with cavernous transformation of the portal vein (CTPV) and whose main portal vein cannot be recanalized. It is still not clear whether transcollateral TIPS can be as effective as portal vein recanalization-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (PVR-TIPS). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcollateral TIPS in the treatment of refractory variceal bleeding with CTPV.MethodsPatients with refractory variceal bleeding caused by CTPV were selected from the database of consecutive patients treated with TIPS in Xijing Hospital from January 2015 to March 2022. They were divided into the transcollateral TIPS group and the PVR-TIPS group. The rebleeding rate, overall survival, shunt dysfunction, overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) and operation-related complications were analyzed.ResultsA total of 192 patients were enrolled, including 21 patients with transcollateral TIPS and 171 patients with PVR-TIPS. Compared with the patients with PVR-TIPS, the patients with transcollateral TIPS had more noncirrhosis (52.4 vs. 19.9%, p = 0.002), underwent fewer splenectomies (14.3 vs. 40.9%, p = 0.018), and had more extensive thromboses (38.1 vs. 15.2%, p = 0.026). There were no differences in rebleeding, survival, shunt dysfunction, or operation-related complication rates between the transcollateral TIPS and PVR-TIPS groups. However, the OHE rate was significantly lower in the transcollateral TIPS group (9.5 vs. 35.1%, p = 0.018).ConclusionTranscollateral TIPS is an effective treatment for CTPV with refractory variceal bleeding.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available