4.5 Article

Pacing induced cardiomyopathy: recognition and management

Journal

HEART
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321723

Keywords

bradycardia; electrocardiography; cardiomyopathy; dilated; pacemaker; artificial; heart failure; systolic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The right ventricle apex remains the standard pacing site in ventricle due to its ease of implantation and procedural safety. However, abnormal ventricular activation and contraction during RV pacing can lead to adverse left ventricular remodelling, predisposing patients to heart failure, atrial arrhythmias, and increased mortality. Pacing induced cardiomyopathy (PIC) is defined by a decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), new-onset heart failure symptoms or atrial fibrillation (AF) after pacemaker implantation. The prevalence of PIC varies between 6% and 25%, with certain risk factors associated with increased risk for PIC, such as male sex, chronic kidney disease, previous myocardial infarction, and baseline LVEF.
Right ventricle (RV) apex continues to remain as the standard pacing site in the ventricle due to ease of implantation, procedural safety and lack of convincing evidence of better clinical outcomes from non-apical pacing sites. Electrical dyssynchrony resulting in abnormal ventricular activation and mechanical dyssynchrony resulting in abnormal ventricular contraction during RV pacing can result in adverse LV remodelling predisposing some patients for recurrent heart failure (HF) hospitalisation, atrial arrhythmias and increased mortality. While there are significant variations in the definition of pacing induced cardiomyopathy (PIC), combining both echocardiographic and clinical features, the most acceptable definition for PIC would be left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of <50%, absolute decline of LVEF by =10% and/or new- onset HF symptoms or atrial fibrillation (AF) after pacemaker implantation. Based on the definitions used, the prevalence of PIC varies between 6% and 25% with overall pooled prevalence of 12%. While most patients undergoing RV pacing do not develop PIC, male sex, chronic kidney disease, previous myocardial infarction, pre-existing AF, baseline LVEF, native QRS duration, RV pacing burden, and paced QRS duration are the factors associated with increased risk for PIC. While conduction system pacing (CSP) using His bundle pacing and left bundle branch pacing appear to reduce the risk for PIC compared with RV pacing, both biventricular pacing and CSP may be used to effectively reverse PIC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available