4.8 Article

CO2 fertilization contributed more than half of the observed forest biomass increase in northern extra-tropical land

Journal

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 15, Pages 4313-4326

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16806

Keywords

carbon cycling; CO2 fertilization; CO2-enrichment experiments; dynamic global vegetation models; emergent constrain

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CO2 fertilization has contributed more than half of the increase in biomass carbon storage in forests over the past decades, as revealed by integrating CO2-enrichment experiments, dynamic global vegetation models, and observation-based biomass datasets.
The existence of a large-biomass carbon (C) sink in Northern Hemisphere extra-tropical ecosystems (NHee) is well-established, but the relative contribution of different potential drivers remains highly uncertain. Here we isolated the historical role of carbon dioxide (CO2) fertilization by integrating estimates from 24 CO2-enrichment experiments, an ensemble of 10 dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) and two observation-based biomass datasets. Application of the emergent constraint technique revealed that DGVMs underestimated the historical response of plant biomass to increasing [CO2] in forests (beta(Mod)(Forest)) but overestimated the response in grasslands (beta(Mod)(Grass)) since the 1850s. Combining the constrained beta(Mod)(Forest)(0.86 +/- 0.28 kg C m(-2) [100 ppm](-1)) with observed forest biomass changes derived from inventories and satellites, we identified that CO2 fertilization alone accounted for more than half (54 +/- 18% and 64 +/- 21%, respectively) of the increase in biomass C storage since the 1990s. Our results indicate that CO2 fertilization dominated the forest biomass C sink over the past decades, and provide an essential step toward better understanding the key role of forests in land-based policies for mitigating climate change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available