4.7 Article

The Devastating 2022 M6.2 Afghanistan Earthquake: Challenges, Processes, and Implications

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 50, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2022GL102176

Keywords

Afghanistan; earthquake; InSAR; moment-tensor; peak-ground-velocity; seismic hazard

Ask authors/readers for more resources

On June 21st, a Mw6.2 earthquake occurred in the Afghan-Pakistan-border-region, which is within the India-Asia collision zone. It resulted in 1,039 deaths, making it the deadliest earthquake in 2022. By combining seismological and geodetic observations, we investigated the rupture processes and found that a sinistral rupture with maximum slip of 1.8 m occurred on a N20 degrees E striking, sub-vertical fault at 5 km depth. Our findings suggest that both external factors and fault-specific factors contributed to the high destructiveness of this event.
On June 21st, a Mw6.2 earthquake struck the Afghan-Pakistan-border-region, situated within the India-Asia collision. Thousand thirty-nine deaths were reported, making the earthquake the deadliest of 2022. We investigate the event's rupture processes by combining seismological and geodetic observations, aiming to understand what made it that fatal. Our Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar-constrained slip-model and regional moment-tensor inversion, confirmed through field observations, reveal a sinistral rupture with maximum slip of 1.8 m at 5 km depth on a N20 degrees E striking, sub-vertical fault. We suggest that not only external factors (event-time, building stock) but fault-specific factors made the event excessively destructive. Surface rupture was favored by the rock foliation, coinciding with the fault strike. The distribution of Peak-Ground-Velocity was governed by the sub-vertical fault. Maximum slip was large compared to other events globally and might have resulted in peak-frequencies coinciding with resonance-frequencies of the local buildings and demonstrates the devastating impact of moderate-size earthquakes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available