4.7 Article

Geoelectric Characterization of Hyporheic Exchange Flow in the Bedrock-Lined Streambed of East Fork Poplar Creek, Oak Ridge, Tennessee

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 50, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2022GL102616

Keywords

self-potential; electric resistivity tomography; surface-water; groundwater; hyporheic exchange; bedrock rivers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A multimethod geoelectric survey was conducted to identify locations of surface-water and groundwater exchange and characterize subsurface flow paths in a bedrock-lined stream in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The survey included a waterborne self-potential (WaSP) survey in the stream and electric resistivity tomography (ERT) on the adjacent flood plain. The combination of WaSP and ERT data supported the interpretation that exchange occurs along fractures and fault lines in the limestone creek bed.
A multimethod geoelectric survey was implemented between January and March 2022 along a 220-m long reach of the bedrock-lined streambed of East Fork Poplar Creek in Oak Ridge, Tennessee to identify locations of surface-water and groundwater exchange and characterize the subsurface flow paths that convey water between the stream and flood plain. A waterborne self-potential (WaSP) survey was completed in January 2022 to measure the electric streaming-potential field in the stream. Electric resistivity tomography (ERT) was performed in March 2022 on the flood plain adjacent to the WaSP survey reach to map the electric resistivity distribution and characterize the hydrogeology and subsurface flow paths that facilitate surface-water and groundwater exchange in the bedrock-lined stream. The combination of WaSP and ERT data support the qualitative interpretation that surface-water and groundwater exchange likely occurs along fractures in outcropping bedrock and along two fault lines that intersect the limestone creek bed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available