4.7 Article

The Global Seismic Moment Rate of Mars After Event S1222a

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 50, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2022GL102296

Keywords

Mars; InSight; seismic moment rate; S1222a

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The seismic activity on Mars is described by the corner magnitude and the seismic moment rate. The Marsquake S1222a is large enough to represent the global activity and provides observational constraints on the moment rate. The magnitude-frequency distribution of relevant Marsquakes shows a b-value of 1.06. The moment rate is estimated to be between 1.55x10^15 Nm/a and 1.97x10^18 Nm/a, with a peak near 4.9x10^16 Nm/a. Comparisons with pre-InSight estimations suggest that previous estimates tend to overestimate the moment rate and a significant portion of tectonic deformation may occur silently, while seismicity is likely restricted to localized centers rather than spread across the entire planet.
The seismic activity of a planet can be described by the corner magnitude, events larger than which are extremely unlikely, and the seismic moment rate, the long-term average of annual seismic moment release. Marsquake S1222a proves large enough to be representative of the global activity of Mars and places observational constraints on the moment rate. The magnitude-frequency distribution of relevant Marsquakes indicates a b $b$-value of 1.06. The moment rate is likely between 1.55x1015Nm/a $1.55\times {10}<^>{15}\mathrm{N}\mathrm{m}/\mathrm{a}$ and 1.97x1018Nm/a $1.97\times {10}<^>{18}\mathrm{N}\mathrm{m}/\mathrm{a}$, with a marginal distribution peaking at 4.9x1016Nm/a $4.9\times {10}<^>{16}\mathrm{N}\mathrm{m}/\mathrm{a}$. Comparing this with pre-InSight estimations shows that these tended to overestimate the moment rate, and that 30% or more of the tectonic deformation may occur silently, whereas the seismicity is probably restricted to localized centers rather than spread over the entire planet.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available