4.6 Article

Characteristics and formation of bedrock mega-grooves (BMGs) in glaciated terrain: 2-conceptual models of BMG initiation

Journal

GEOMORPHOLOGY
Volume 427, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2023.108620

Keywords

Glacial erosion; Bedrock mega -groove; Erodents; Antecedent conditions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding the origin and evolution of bedrock mega-grooves (BMGs) is crucial. This study proposes several scenarios to explain the initiation of parallel fluted terrain incised through resistant substrates by uni-directional fast ice flow. The initiation of BMGs is likely controlled by geological factors such as linear features or adjacent lithologies, while antecedent land surface conditions or pre-Quaternary regolith on etchplains may also contribute to their initiation.
Understanding BMG formation equates to being able to explain their initiation as well as their subsequent evolution. Several scenarios of bedrock mega-groove (BMG) initiation are proposed here, which attempt to explain how such parallel fluted terrain could be incised through resistant substrates over the relatively short temporal periods associated with uni-directional fast ice flow. In cases where geological controls have been inferred from the BMG morphology or location, groove initiation was likely either structural through the exploitation of linear features, or lithological, whereby the origin of harder erodents necessary for abrading softer rocks can be explained by the succession of adjacent lithologies along former ice flow paths. Where no geological control over BMG initiation could be inferred, it is hypothesized that their initiation was due to antecedent land surface conditions, through gradual bedrock elimination or related to pre-Quaternary regolith on etchplains, which was potentially a source of erodents no longer visible in the landscape.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available