4.7 Review

A review of doped lanthanum gallates as electrolytes for intermediate temperature solid oxides fuel cells: From materials processing to electrical and thermo-mechanical properties

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages 1-16

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.09.025

Keywords

Solid Oxide Fuel Cell; Lanthanum-Gallate; Synthesis and processing methods; Ionic conductivity; Electrical; mechanical and thermal properties

Funding

  1. Spanish Government [MAT2011-23623, UNBA10-4E-316]
  2. FEDER-EU
  3. XaRMAE (Xarxa de Referencia en Materials Avancats per l'Enginyeria, Generalitat de Catalunya)
  4. Torres Quevedo
  5. Juan de la Cierva Programme [PTQ-11-04648, JCI-2012-14454]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present review is focused on SrO- and MgO-doped lanthanum gallates (LSGMs), specifically in those key aspects related to their implementation as electrolyte for Intermediate Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. After a brief survey of the state-of-the-art for the LSGMs, the attention is focused on the ionic transport properties for the relevant compositions. The design, manufacturing and performance of cells using LSGM as electrolyte are discussed along the review. Particular interest is given to the impact of synthesis routes for lowering their sintering temperatures. A short discussion on the chemical compatibility between electrolyte and electrodes in cells is also included. Afterwards, mechanical and thermal properties of LSGMs reported determined though conventional methods at different working temperatures are discussed. Finally, the microstructural and compositional effects related to their electrical and mechanical properties at micro- and nanometric length scale are assessed as a complementary tool for future developments in solid electrolyte materials. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available