4.3 Review

Nontyphoid Salmonella in farm animals and food products in the Middle East and North Africa: a systematic review

Journal

FUTURE MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages 521-534

Publisher

FUTURE MEDICINE LTD
DOI: 10.2217/fmb-2022-0239

Keywords

antibiotic resistance; food of animal origin; MENA countries; nontyphoidal Salmonella; prevalence; serotype distribution

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence, serotype distribution, and antibiotic resistance of nontyphoidal Salmonella in animal food products from Middle East/North Africa (MENA) countries. The results showed a high prevalence of Salmonella in MENA countries (12.80%), with Lebanon having the highest prevalence (41.10%). Poultry had a higher prevalence of Salmonella (14.49%) compared to livestock (9.62%). Salmonella enteritidis was the most commonly identified serotype (21.99%), and sulfamethoxazole had the highest resistance rate (78.81%). The authors emphasize the importance of implementing control measures in MENA countries to limit the spread of Salmonella.
Aim: This study aimed to document the prevalence, serotype distribution and antibiotic resistance of nontyphoidal Salmonella in animal food products from Middle East/North Africa (MENA) countries. Methods: Peer-reviewed articles published from 1 January 2011 to 7 March 2023 were included and the data were narratively synthesized and statistically analyzed to estimate and compare the overall prevalence. Results: The authors found a high prevalence of Salmonella in MENA countries (12.80%), with the highest prevalence in Lebanon (41.10%). Poultry had a higher prevalence of Salmonella (14.49%) than livestock (9.62%). Salmonella enteritidis was the most commonly identified serotype (21.99%), and sulfamethoxazole had the highest resistance rate (78.81%). Conclusion: The authors emphasize the importance of implementing control measures in MENA countries to limit the spread of the Salmonella pathogen.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available