4.7 Article

High-amylose wheat tortillas with reduced in vitro digestion and enhanced resistant starch content

Journal

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
Volume 137, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.108321

Keywords

High-amylose wheat; Tortillas; Amylose content; Texture; In-vitro digestibility; Resistant starch

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research has found that the incorporation of high amylose wheat flour (HAWF) can increase the nutritional functionality of bread and noodles. This study explores the application of HAWF in tortillas and reveals that tortillas made with HAWF have lower breaking force and extensibility, but higher resistant starch content. Compared to loaf bread or noodles, tortillas exhibit lower starch digestion and higher resistant starch content.
Increased nutritional functionality in bread and noodles have been reported with the incorporation of high amylose wheat flour (HAWF). Here, we broaden the application of HAWF and report structure-function-nutrition relationships for tortillas prepared with 50% and 100% incorporation of HAWF. The breaking force and extensibility of the HAWF tortillas were lower than controls resulting from incompletely gelatinized high-amylose wheat starch (HAWS). The digestion degree of tortillas was significantly reduced by increase of amylose content due to HAWS structural features and enzyme hindrance effects of greater protein content, with resistant starch (RS) content increasing from similar to 3% in control (32% amylose) to similar to 12% in tortillas with 71% amylose and similar to 23% in tortillas with 84% amylose. In addition, tortillas showed lower starch digestion and higher RS than loaf bread or noodle counterparts. This demonstrates that wheat food in vitro enzyme hydrolysis is not only a function of starch structure, but also the local density of the microstructure formed during food processing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available