4.7 Article

Use of high-resolution mass spectrometry for veterinary drug multi-residue analysis

Journal

FOOD CONTROL
Volume 145, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109488

Keywords

HRMS; Risk -based monitoring; Growth promotors; Antibiotics; Residues; Food safety

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reviews the applicability of high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) techniques for the analysis of veterinary medicinal products and hormones in food. Different measurement and data evaluation strategies are discussed, and it suggests that the implementation of HRMS can enable a shift from predefined scope methods to real risk-based monitoring for routine food and feed analysis.
National and international food and feed safety authorities are shifting from routine-to risk-based monitoring. Risk-based monitoring requires flexibility in the scope of analytes, matrices, and sampling. Also, risk-based monitoring implies a desire for retrospective analysis using different scope(s) to follow trends, identify new food safety threats, and monitor the effectiveness of policy interventions. The current availability of sensitive and accurate high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) fits within this approach. This writing reviews the appli-cability of HRMS techniques for food control laboratories in the analysis of veterinary medicinal products and hormones in food, using HRMS and legislative background. Different HRMS measurement and data evaluation strategies are identified and discussed. Among them, routine screening and confirmation, suspect screening, semi-untargeted analysis (common mass pattern search), metabolite and degradation product identification, profiling for deviating samples, physiological markers or treatments, and identification of unknowns can be found. The food safety competent authorities could shift from methods with predefined scope to real risk-based monitoring by implementing HRMS for routine food and feed analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available