4.7 Article

Rapid and accurate classification of Aspergillus ochraceous contamination in Robusta green coffee bean through near-infrared spectral analysis using machine learning

Journal

FOOD CONTROL
Volume 145, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109446

Keywords

Machine learning; Classification; Near-infrared; Fungal contamination; Coffee

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the NIR spectral-based classification and detection of Aspergillus ochraceous contamination in Robusta green coffee beans using machine learning algorithms. The results showed that the decision tree approach achieved high accuracy in both training and testing datasets, indicating the potential of early detection of fungal contamination in green coffee beans using NIR spectroscopy and machine learning.
Near-infrared (NIR) spectral-based classification of Aspergillus ochraceous contamination in the Robusta green coffee bean was investigated. Six different learning algorithms, including linear discriminant analysis (LDA), support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), decision tree (Tree), Naive Bayes (NB), and quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), were applied for the investigating purpose. Four classes of fungal contamination on coffee beans, non-fungal contaminated beans on day 1 and day 3 (NCB-D1 and NCB-D3) and fungal contaminated beans on day 1 and day 3 (CB-D1 and CB-D3), were set for the classification intention. Based on the 6 learning algorithms, the Tree approach was optimal, displaying a training accuracy of 97.5%. As proven by the testing dataset, the classification accuracy of the Tree was also at 97.5%. With this number, the Tree could correctly classify 100% between the contaminated and non-contaminated coffee beans. These findings exhibit the po-tential of the NIR spectroscopy accompanied by machine learning for the early detection of fungal contamination in green coffee beans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available