4.7 Article

Investigation of blueberry juice fermentation by mixed probiotic strains: Regression modeling, machine learning optimization and comparison with fermentation by single strain in the phenolic and volatile profiles

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 405, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134982

Keywords

Lactic acid bacteria; Blueberry juice; Mixed fermentation; Simplex lattice mixture design; Genetic algorithm; Volatile compound

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three strains, L. fermentum, L. plantarum and S. thermophilus, were used to ferment blueberry juice. The combination of S. thermophilus with either L. fermentum or L. plantarum weakened the capacity of Lactobacillus strains to enrich phenolics, and the combinations of these strains had no synergistic effect of synthesizing lactic acid.
Three strains, including L. fermentum, L. plantarum and S. thermophilus, were combined to ferment blueberry juice. Through the sequential simplex lattice mixture design, regression modeling and genetic algorithm opti-mization, it was found that the combination of S. thermophilus with either L. fermentum or L. plantarum weakened the capacity of Lactobacillus strains to enrich phenolics, and the combinations of these strains had no synergistic effect of synthesizing lactic acid. The resulting optimal inoculation proportion to enrich phenolics was the mixed L. fermentum and L. plantarum at 0.5:0.5. After fermentation for 48 h, total phenolic, ferulic acid, rutin, and quercetin-3-rhamnoside of mixed fermented samples were 82.19 %, 15.22 %, 79.08 % and 98.59 % higher than the unfermented juice, and their contents were all highest among the fermented samples. Moreover, the samples fermented by mixed strains possessed higher amounts of 3-methyl-1-butanol, 2-methyl-1-propanol, 2-heptanone and 2-pentanone than samples fermented by L. fermentum, S. thermophilus and unfermented samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available