4.4 Article

Rapid diagnosis of Tobacco mosaic virus in tobacco using time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay

Journal

FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages 10-20

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09540105.2023.2185568

Keywords

Tobacco mosaic virus; time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay; rapid diagnostic test; lateral flow immunoassay; field detection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) was detected in tobacco using a time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay (TRFIA) with a detection limit of 0.24 ng/mL. Monoclonal antibodies developed from TMV virions were conjugated to Eu3+ nanospheres. The specificity of the TRFIA platform was confirmed using ten species of tobacco-infecting phytopathogens. The TRFIA platform was successfully applied for on-site TMV testing in 10,000 tobacco leaf samples collected from five fields in Kunming, China.
Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) causes a significant yield loss in solanaceous crops. Accurate and rapid diagnosis of TMV is an essential pre-requisite for proactive and tailored disease management strategies, filling the gap between more rigorous laws regarding pesticide use and maintaining crop production. Herein, we developed a time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay (TRFIA) to quantitatively detect TMV in tobacco. TMV virions were used as immunogens to develop monoclonal antibodies, which were then conjugated to Eu3+ nanospheres. The detection limit of the TRFIA platform was 0.24 ng/mL, with recovery rates in the range of 90.71-108.11% in spiked tobacco. The specificity was confirmed using ten species of tobacco-infecting phytopathogens. In-field applicability was implemented by screening for TMV in 10,000 tobacco leaf samples collected from five fields in Kunming, China. Overall, the proposed TRFIA platform is rapid, accurate, and end-user friendly, demonstrating its application in TMV onsite testing in tobacco.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available