Journal
FISH AND FISHERIES
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 439-453Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/faf.12737
Keywords
climate change; fisheries management targets; maximum sustainable yield
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Climate change can impact global fisheries productivity. Maintaining current management targets is more beneficial for biodiversity protection than increasing catch through climate adaptation in maximum sustainable yield (MSY) based management. The conservation gain of maintaining management targets increases as the harmful impacts of climate change on productivity worsen. New management tools are needed to balance conservation and food production in ecosystems with non-stationary productivity.
Climate change is projected to affect the productivity of global fisheries. Management based on maximum sustainable yield (MSY) has been effective at eliminating overfishing in many regions. However, continuing to use yield-maximizing targets under climate-driven changes in productivity can result in higher anthropogenic pressure on populations subject to climate-related stress than maintaining status quo management targets. We demonstrate this effect using a theoretical example and case studies from snow crab in the eastern Bering Sea and a global marine fisheries database. In these examples, the conservation gain (i.e. biomass in the ocean) of maintaining status quo management targets is larger than the small gain in harvest made through climate adaptation in MSY-based management. The aggregate conservation gain of maintaining management targets increases as the harmful impacts of climate change on productivity worsen. Instead of climate-adaptive MSY-based targets, new management tools are needed to balance conservation and food production in ecosystems of populations displaying non-stationary productivity.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available