4.1 Article

Study the conservation degree in wood structures using TDR and GPR techniques

Journal

EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08123985.2023.2203856

Keywords

TDR; GPR; wood structures

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The condition of the wood structure and its components should be recorded before taking any action. The diagnosis of wood structures in heritage should come before any intervention. It is important to know the construction, decay condition, and causes, as well as any damage or structural failure. The diagnosis should be based on non-destructive testing and, if needed, laboratory testing. Water is a major cause of wood decay. Ground-penetrating radar and time domain reflectometry were used in this study to estimate the water content of different types of wood based on its dielectric permittivity. The results were applied to case studies of the Cathedral of Foggia and the Castle of Carosino.
The condition of the wood structure and its components should be carefully recorded before considering any action. The diagnosis of wood structures in heritage should precede any intervention. It is important to know preliminarily the construction and structural system, the decay condition and the causes. Furthermore, damage or structural failure should be considered. The diagnosis must be based principally on measurements of physical parameters using non-destructive testing, and if necessary on laboratory testing. Water is one of the principal causes of wood decay. In this study, ground-penetrating radar and time domain reflectometry were used to estimate the dielectric permittivity and successively the volumetric water content of several types of wood. An empirical relationship was found between the dielectric constant and volumetric water content. Results were applied to two case studies: the Cathedral of Foggia and the Castle of Carosino.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available