4.7 Article

Signal Quality Index for the fetal heart rates: Development and improvements for fetal monitoring

Journal

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
Volume 213, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119244

Keywords

Fetal heart rates; Signal quality; Wearable devices

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, an easy-to-use Fetal heart rate Signal Quality Index (FSQI) was developed to accurately identify and exclude low-quality signals for assessing fetal health. The FSQI algorithm achieved a high overall accuracy of 99.8842% in signal quality classification and significantly reduced incorrectly detected deceleration events.
Fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring is the most widely used tool in clinics to assess fetal health. However, FHR with low-quality signals may somehow exaggerate the risk of the fetus suffering from acidemia, thus contributing to an increase in cesarean section rates. If there is an algorithm capable to identify and reject low -quality signals and then calculate heart rate parameters only on high-quality signals, inappropriate obstetric interventions may be greatly reduced. Currently, only the Signal Quality Index (SQI) is available for adults. When we applied SQI to fetal data, its performance drops dramatically. To fill the gap in the fetal signal quality index, we developed an easy-to-use Fetal heart rate Signal Quality Index (FSQI) in this paper. Firstly, we used a human-in-the-loop strategy to reduce the amount of data annotation effort. Secondly, we developed the FSQI algorithm oriented towards the fetus to identify low-quality signal segments. Further, we proposed a post-processing technique based on fine-grained recognition to identify low-quality signal segments more accurately. Finally, we applied the FSQI algorithm in combination with the existing FHR deceleration event detection algorithm to test the effectiveness of the algorithm. The results showed that the FSQI algorithm we developed achieved an overall accuracy of 99.8842% in signal quality classification, while also eliminating 94.92% of the incorrectly detected deceleration events of current state-of-the-art methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available