4.4 Article

Similarity revisited: shock random walks in the asymmetric simple exclusion process with open boundaries

Journal

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL-SPECIAL TOPICS
Volume 232, Issue 11, Pages 1721-1741

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1140/epjs/s11734-023-00799-4

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The reverse duality between the asymmetric simple exclusion process (ASEP) and a biased random walk is proven for a specific set of boundary parameters. The duality function is determined by the configuration probabilities of a family of Bernoulli shock measures with a microscopic shock at a particular lattice site. The boundary conditions of the dual random walk depend on the choice of the duality function, and as a result, the time-dependent distribution of the open ASEP can be represented as a convex combination of shock measures with shocks at different positions.
A reverse duality between the asymmetric simple exclusion process (ASEP) with open boundary conditions and a biased random walk of a single particle is proved for a special manifold of boundary parameters of the ASEP. The duality function is given by the configuration probabilities of a family of Bernoulli shock measures with a microscopic shock at site x of the lattice. The boundary conditions of the dual random walk, which can be reflecting or absorbing, depend on the choice of the duality function. As a consequence of this duality, the full time-dependent distribution of the open ASEP starting from a fixed shock measure at x is given for any time t > 0 by a convex combination of shock measures with shock at position y. The coefficients are the transition probabilities P(x, t-y, 0) at time t of the random walk starting at site y. It is also shown that this family of shock measures arises from a similarity transformation of the two-dimensional representation of the matrix algebra for the stationary matrix product measure of the open ASEP. This implies a further duality between random walks with different boundary conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available