Journal
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE
Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages 183-191Publisher
EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA
DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.07501-9
Keywords
Trigeminal neuralgia; Low-level light therapy; Magnetic field therapy
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study compares the effects of electromagnetic therapy (EMT) and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on trigeminal neuralgia (TN) in diabetes patients. The results show that the group receiving LLLT has significantly better scores on the visual analog scale and amplitude of compound muscle action potentials compared to the other groups. The conclusion is that LLLT is more effective than EMT in reducing trigeminal pain, and increasing masseter and temporalis muscles' compound action potential amplitude in diabetic patients with TN.
BACKGROUND: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is defined as intense, abrupt, often unilateral, stabbing, short, repeated episodes of pain in one or more distributional branches of the trigeminal nerve. AIM: To see how electromagnetic therapy (EMT) compared to low-level laser therapy (LLLT) affect TN in diabetes patients. DESIGN: This is a randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Physical therapy and Neurology Outpatients Clinics at Faculty of Physical Therapy. POPULATION: One hundred and forty diabetic patients with TN were evaluated for eligibility. As a result, 126 diabetic patients with TN were included in this trial. They were randomly divided into three equal-sized groups using random allocation software. Due to travel to another coun-try, two patients did not complete the treatment protocol, and four opted out of the post-therapy evaluation. So, 120 volunteer diabetic patients with TN of both sexes were diagnosed for the participation in this study by a neurologist (N.=40 in each group). METHODS: For two months, participants in the control group A received the medication only (oral hypoglycemic drugs, Analgesics, vitamin B12), participants in the study group B received the medications as in group A in addition to LLLT, and participants in the study group C received medication as in group A in addition to electromagnetic therapy (EMT). The primary outcome was the amplitude of compound muscle action potentials of tem-poralis and masseter muscles by using NEXUS 10 (Mind media). The secondary outcome was pain intensity by using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). RESULTS: According to the results of this study, there is a statistically significant difference in visual analog scale scores and the amplitude of compound muscle action potentials of the temporalis and masseter muscles among groups in favor of group B. CONCLUSIONS: After treatment, all groups improved significantly, with the laser group outperforming the electromagnetic group by a large margin. For irradiation, LLLT was more effective than EMT in reducing diabetic patients' trigeminal pain, and increasing masseter and tempo-ralis muscles compound action potential amplitude in diabetic patients with TN.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available