4.7 Article

Probabilistic ordinal regression methods for multiple criteria sorting admitting certain and uncertain preferences

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume 311, Issue 2, Pages 596-616

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2023.05.007

Keywords

Decision analysis; Ordinal classification; Bayesian inference; Stochastic acceptability analysis; Indirect preference information

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article proposes a family of probabilistic ordinal regression methods for multiple criteria sorting. It introduces Bayesian Ordinal Regression and Subjective Stochastic Ordinal Regression to derive the class assignments of alternatives based on provided preference information. The introduced approaches are evaluated through an experimental study involving real-world datasets.
We propose a family of probabilistic ordinal regression methods for multiple criteria sorting. They employ an additive value function model to aggregate the performances on multiple criteria and the threshold -based procedure to derive the class assignments of alternatives. The Decision Makers (DMs) can provide certain and uncertain assignment examples concerning a subset of reference alternatives, expressing the confidence levels using linguistic descriptions. On the one hand, we introduce Bayesian Ordinal Regres-sion to derive a posterior distribution over a set of all potential sorting models by defining a likelihood for the provided preference information and specifying a prior of the preference model. This distribu-tion emphasizes the potential differences in the models' abilities to reconstruct the DM's classification examples and thus is robust to the DM's potential cognitive biases in her judgments. We also develop a Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm to summarize the posterior distribution of the preference model. On the other hand, we adapt Subjective Stochastic Ordinal Regression to sorting problems. It builds a prob-ability distribution over the space of all value functions and class thresholds compatible with the DM's certain holistic judgments. The ambiguity in representing incomplete and potentially uncertain prefer-ence information by the assumed sorting model is quantified using class acceptability indices. We inves-tigate the performance and robustness of the introduced approaches through an extensive experimental study involving real-world datasets. We also compare them against novel methods based on mathemati-cal programming that handle potential inconsistencies in uncertain preferences in the traditional way by minimizing the misclassification error or the number of misclassified reference alternatives.& COPY; 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available