4.5 Article

Contact tracing for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE): evaluation of the Dutch policy of quintuple screening cultures

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10096-023-04632-7

Keywords

Vancomycin resistance; Enterococcus faecium; Infection control; Contact tracing; Policy; Outbreaks

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to improve the sensitivity of detecting vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) transmission and determine the time from presumed exposure to detectable colonization. Retrospective analysis of 9 VRE outbreaks showed that using the first three out of five rectal swabs identified 89% of all secondary cases, compared to only 64% with the first swab. In addition, taking one or more rectal swabs around day 9 after presumed exposure was found to be the most effective screening approach.
Detection of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) is hampered by low sensitivity of rectal swab cultures. This study aimed to define the number of screening cultures needed to increase sensitivity to detect VRE transmission, and to determine time from presumed exposure to detectable colonization. In a tertiary care setting, we retrospectively analyzed data from 9 VRE outbreaks. As a proxy or estimation for time to detectable colonization, the time between first positive culture of the presumed index patient and that of their contacts was determined. Only 64% of secondary cases were positive in the first out of five cultures. By using the first three out of five rectal swabs, 89% (95%CI: 78-95%) of all secondary cases would have been identified. The median number of days between the positive culture of the index patient and the first positive culture of secondary cases was 9 days. Eleven percent of secondary cases would have been missed if only three rectal samples would have been obtained. Furthermore, our results show that one or more rectal swabs taken around day 9 after presumed exposure should at least be included in the screening approach. In our setting, obtaining a fourth and a fifth rectal swab showed a relevant additional value compared to only one to three swabs. Our findings are useful for determining the most effective VRE contact tracing approach to prevent transmission.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available