4.7 Article

A randomised phase II study of modified FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (JCOG1407)

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 181, Issue -, Pages 135-144

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.12.014

Keywords

Locally advanced pancreatic cancer; mFOLFIRINOX; Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel; Phase II randomised Trial; First-line chemotherapy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of mFOLFIRINOX with that of GnP for LAPC. The results showed that GnP had better response rate, CA19-9 response, and mild gastrointestinal toxicities, making it a candidate for a subsequent phase III trial.
Aim: We compared the efficacy of modified 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFIRINOX) with that of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC).Methods: Patients with untreated LAPC were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive mFOLFIR-INOX or GnP. One-year overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. The major second-ary end-points included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) response, and adverse events. The sample size was 124 patients to select a more effective regimen with a minimum probability of 0.85 and to examine the null hypoth-esis of the 1-year OS < 53%.Results: Of the 126 patients enrolled from 29 institutions, 125 were deemed eligible. The 1-year OS was 77.4% (95% CI, 64.9-86.0) and 82.5% (95% CI, 70.7-89.9) in the mFOLFIRINOX and GnP arms, respectively. The median PFS was 11.2 (95% CI, 9.9-15.9) and 9.4 months (95% CI, 7.4-12.8) in the mFOLFIRINOX and GnP arms, respectively. The RR and CA19-9 response rate were 30.9% (95% CI, 19.1-44.8) and 57.1% (95% CI, 41.0-72.3) and 42.1% (95% CI 29.1-55.9) and 85.0% (95% CI, 70.2-94.3) in the mFOLFIRINOX and GnP arms, respectively. Grade 3-4 diarrhoea and anorexia were predominant in the mFOL-FIRINOX arm.Conclusion: GnP was considered the candidate for a subsequent phase III trial because of its better RR, CA19-9 response, and mild gastrointestinal toxicities. Both regimens displayed higher efficacy in the 1-year survival than in the historical data of gemcitabine monotherapy. 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available