4.7 Article

Health-related quality-of-life results from the randomised phase II TAVAREC trial on temozolomide with or without bevacizumab in 1p/19q intact first- recurrence World Health Organization grade 2 and 3 glioma (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 26091)

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 190, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.112946

Keywords

Health-related quality of life; Glioma; Bevacizumab; Temozolomide; EORTC; RCTs

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In an international study, the addition of bevacizumab to temozolomide did not significantly improve or negatively affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with non1p/19q co-deleted WHO grade 2 or 3 gliomas. The study assessed HRQoL using several scales and found no clinically significant differences between the treatment arms.
Background: In an international randomised controlled phase II study of temozolomide (TMZ) versus TMZ in combination with bevacizumab (BEV) in locally diagnosed non1p/19q co-deleted World Health Organization grade 2 or 3 gliomas with a first and contrast enhancing recurrence after initial radiotherapy, and overall survival at 12 months was not significantly different (61% in the TMZ arm and 55% in the TMZ + BEV arm).Objectives: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was a key secondary end-point in this trial, and the main objective of this study was to determine the impact of the addition of BEV to TMZ on HRQoL.Methods: HRQoL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 (version 3) and QLQ-BN20 at baseline, and then every 12 weeks until disease progression. The pre-selected primary HRQoL end-point was the QLQ-C30 global health scale, with self-perceived cognitive functioning and pain selected as secondary HRQoL issues. Analysis was undertaken using linear mixed modelling and complemented with sensitivity analyses using summary statistics. A difference was considered clinically relevant with & GE;10 points difference on a 100-point scale.Results: Baseline compliance was high at 94% and remained above 60% until 72 weeks, limiting the analysis to 60 weeks. Compliance was similar in both arms. We found no statistically significant or clinically significant differences between the primary HRQoL end-point in both treatment arms (p = 0.2642). The sensitivity analyses confirmed this finding. The overall test for post-baseline differences between the two treatment arms also showed no statistically or clinically significant differences regarding the selected secondary end-point scales.Interpretation: The addition of BEV to TMZ in this patient group neither improves nor negatively impacts HRQoL.& COPY; 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available